peopletechguide.com

Category: Time Tracking (Functional)

  • Tracking Changes in Workday Business Processes

    “Who Changed the Offer BP?” – A Common Workday Problem

    Almost every Workday team has experienced this moment: recruiting suddenly stops working as expected, offers get stuck, approvers change, and someone finally asks, “Who changed the Offer business process last week?” The room goes quiet, people check emails and messages, and no one has a clear answer.

    This is not just a technical problem. It is a governance and accountability problem. When business process (BP) changes are not properly tracked, communicated, and owned, HR, Talent Acquisition, and Hiring Managers lose confidence in Workday. The system appears unpredictable and “risky,” even when the root cause is simply a missing process for change control.

    Why Workday Business Process Changes Are So Sensitive

    Business processes in Workday control the steps, routing, notifications, and validations that drive core workflows: hiring, offers, onboarding, job changes, promotions, terminations, and more. A small change in a condition, approver, or step can materially impact:

    • Who needs to approve an action.
    • How long a transaction takes.
    • Which data is required or optional.
    • Which stakeholders are notified—or not notified.

    When these changes are made quickly, without documentation or testing, they often look harmless in the moment. But a week later, when a recruiter asks why offers are stuck or a manager wonders why a new approver is suddenly in the chain, the lack of visibility becomes a major issue.

    Typical Symptoms of Poor BP Change Governance

    If your Workday tenant has weak governance around business process changes, you might notice some of these symptoms:

    • Recruiting or HR users report “something changed” in approval flow, but no one knows exactly what.
    • Approvers change without clear business agreement, creating political or compliance issues.
    • Testing happens directly in production because “it’s just a small tweak.”
    • Documentation about the current BP design is outdated, or doesn’t exist at all.
    • The same issues reappear across releases because no one tracks previous decisions.

    Over time, this erodes trust. Business users start to see Workday as a black box that “randomly changes,” even if those changes were made with good intentions.

    The Foundation: Clear Ownership and Roles

    Before getting into tools and reports, it is crucial to define who actually owns each key business process. For example:

    • HR Operations might own the Hire and Termination processes.
    • Talent Acquisition might own the Offer and Recruiting processes.
    • HR and Finance together might own Job Change and Compensation changes.

    Clear ownership means:

    • No changes to a process are made without the knowledge and approval of its owner.
    • Owners participate in design, testing, and sign-off for any configuration updates.
    • There is a known “RACI” (who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed) for each core BP.

    When ownership is vague, changes happen informally, through ad-hoc requests and one-off messages. When ownership is explicit, it becomes easier to implement a simple but effective change control process.

    Practical Ways to Track Who Changed What and When

    Workday provides multiple tools and logs that help teams understand configuration changes, but they only work if you build them into your operating rhythm. Depending on your tenant setup and access, you may have options such as:

    • Configuration reports that show recent changes in business processes and related objects.
    • Delivered or custom audit reports that track who made specific configuration updates and when.
    • Change tickets or requests in your ITSM tool (e.g., Jira, ServiceNow) that record the “why” behind changes.

    The key is to combine system-level visibility (who changed what, technically) with process-level governance (who approved the change, and what problem it solved). Technical logs alone are not enough; they need to be tied to a clear request and approval trail.

    A Simple Change Control Flow for Workday Business Processes

    You do not need a huge bureaucracy to manage business process changes. A lightweight change control flow is enough to avoid most issues. For example:

    1. Request
      A user identifies a problem (e.g., an approver is missing, a step is unnecessary) and submits a change request with context.
    2. Review and Design
      The Workday admin and BP owner review the request, explore options, and agree on the design.
    3. Configure in Non-Production
      The change is made in a test or sandbox tenant, not directly in production.
    4. Test with Real Scenarios
      HR, Talent, or Finance users test the change using realistic scenarios and confirm the expected behavior.
    5. Approve and Document
      The owner approves the change, and a short design note is recorded (what changed, why, and any impacts).
    6. Move to Production and Communicate
      The change is migrated, and impacted users receive a short update—especially if their approvals or steps change.

    With this simple pattern, the question “Who changed the Offer BP last week?” has a clear answer: there is a ticket, an owner, and documentation.

    Communicating Business Process Changes to Stakeholders

    Even when changes are well-controlled, they can still cause confusion if users are not informed. For Workday business process changes, communication should match the impact:

    • Small, low-impact tweaks can be summarized in a monthly “Workday changes” digest.
    • Medium-impact changes, like new approvers or extra validation steps, should be highlighted in targeted emails or intranet posts.
    • High-impact changes that affect many users or critical workflows may deserve training sessions, FAQs, or quick reference guides.

    The goal is not to flood users with technical details, but to answer their key questions: What changed? Why did it change? What do I need to do differently?

    Building Trust by Making Workday Changes Visible

    Ultimately, tracking and governing business process changes is about building trust. HR, Talent, and Finance teams are more willing to rely on Workday when:

    • They know there is a stable process for changing core workflows.
    • They can see, in plain language, what has changed and why.
    • They feel involved in design decisions rather than surprised by new behavior.

    The next time someone asks, “Who changed the Offer BP last week?”, your goal is not just to have a name. Your goal is to be able to say: “Here’s the change request, here’s who approved it, here’s the test we ran, and here’s how we communicated it.”

    That is how Workday becomes simpler, more predictable, and more trusted for HR and Finance teams.

  • Clean Workday Time Tracking Blueprint

    Clean Workday Time Tracking Blueprint

    Time Tracking is where HR, operations and payroll all meet your Workday configuration. If Time Tracking is messy, you will feel it every single pay period in the form of corrections, overrides and frustrated managers. A clean design for Time Entry Methods, Time Entry Codes, Time Code Groups, Time Entry Templates and Work Schedules gives you predictable timesheets and reliable payroll integration.​

    Start with how the business really works

    Before you build anything in Workday Time Tracking, map how people actually work:

    • Do workers track in/out time, or just total hours per day?
    • Are shifts fixed, rotating or highly flexible?
    • Do workers charge time to Projects, Cost Centers or other Worktags?
    • Which time events drive extra pay – overtime, shift differential, call-out, on-call?​

    Use these answers to drive your decisions on Time Entry Method, the set of Time Entry Codes you need, and how complex your Time Calculations should be.​​

    Choose the right Time Entry Methods

    In Workday you can configure different Time Entry Methods such as:

    • Enter Time by Week or Enter Time by Day (elapsed hours).
    • In/Out entry (clock-style time with start and end).
    • Time Clock Events (check-in/checkout, potentially with geofencing).​

    Good practice:

    • Use In/Out for environments where labor laws and break tracking are strict (manufacturing, retail, healthcare).​
    • Use by Week/Day for professional services or salaried populations who track hours mainly for cost allocation and utilization.​
    • Avoid mixing too many methods for similar workers; it complicates training, reporting and support.​

    The key is consistency: workers in the same Time Tracking Configuration should have similar time entry experiences and rules.​

    Design Time Entry Codes that make sense

    Time Entry Codes are the building blocks on the timesheet. They represent things like Regular Hours, Overtime, Training, Travel, or On Call.​​

    When designing Time Entry Codes:

    • Keep names simple and user-friendly: “Regular Hours”, “Overtime 1.5x”, “Training – Internal”.
    • Map each code to the right Time Type and related Worktags (such as Cost Center, Project, Location) so reporting and payroll know how to treat the hours.​
    • Only create a new Time Entry Code when it truly has different behavior (calculation, posting, or reporting) – not just a different label.​

    Too many codes on the timesheet will confuse employees and lead to mis-classified hours. A smaller, well-designed set of codes keeps Time Tracking clean and sustainable.​

    Group workers with Time Code Groups

    Instead of assigning every Time Entry Code directly to workers, use Time Code Groups. These are collections of codes workers are eligible to use.​​

    Patterns that work well:

    • Create Time Code Groups by population, such as “TCG – Salaried – Global”, “TCG – Hourly – US Retail”, “TCG – Contractors – IT”.
    • Tie Time Code Groups to Eligibility Rules using criteria like Company, Location, Worker Type and Pay Group.​
    • Make sure each group has only the codes that population actually needs; fewer options on the timesheet means fewer mistakes.​

    From a practitioner view, Time Code Groups are your main control over what employees see when they click Enter Time. Design them intentionally, not as an afterthought.​​

    Build clean Time Entry Templates

    Time Entry Templates define the layout and options of the timesheet itself – what fields show up, which columns are there, and how workers enter time.​​

    When configuring Time Entry Templates:

    • Choose the right layout:
      • Simple grid for “hours per day” style.
      • In/Out style with Start Time, End Time, and Meal Break fields.
      • Project-based layout when workers must enter Project, Task, or other worktags on each time block.​​
    • Include only necessary fields: Position, Worktags, Comments – avoid cluttering the screen.​
    • Enable features like Autofill from Prior Week or Autofill from Schedule when appropriate to reduce manual entry for regular patterns.​

    Think of Time Entry Templates as the UX layer of Time Tracking. A clean template can cut time-to-complete and errors significantly.​​

    Configure Work Schedules and Period Schedules correctly

    Work Schedules and Period Schedules drive how Workday expects employees to work and how timesheets are broken into periods.​​

    Key components:

    • Period Schedules: Define the time entry period (weekly, biweekly, semi-monthly) and align to payroll cycles where possible.​
    • Work Schedules: Define expected working days and hours per day for different groups (e.g., Mon–Fri 9–5, 4-on-4-off shifts).​​
    • Use Work Schedule Calendars or groups where you need shift patterns for overtime or shift premiums.​​

    Well-designed schedules enable:

    • Accurate validation (e.g., maximum hours per day).
    • Better reporting on variance between scheduled and actual hours.
    • Cleaner calculations for overtime and holiday pay.​

    Build smart Time Calculations, not monsters

    Time Calculations and Time Calculation Groups tell Workday how to transform raw time blocks into paid hours, overtime, premiums, and other pay-related metrics.​​

    Best practices:

    • Start with simple rules: e.g., “Hours above 40 in a week go to Overtime 1.5x”.
    • Use Time Calculation Groups that match your business rules, such as a group for US hourly workers and another for EU shift workers.​​
    • Avoid building a separate calculation group for every micro-scenario; instead use conditions within shared groups wherever possible.​

    Overly complex Time Calculations are hard to test, explain and maintain. Aim for rule sets that a new Workday Time Tracking admin can understand within an hour.​​

    Connect Time Tracking with Absence and Payroll

    Time Tracking rarely stands alone. It should work seamlessly with Absence Management and Payroll (Workday or external).​

    Integration points to check:

    • How Time Off entries display on the timesheet for Time Tracking workers, and how they impact payable hours.​
    • Mapping of Time Entry Codes to Earnings / Pay Components in payroll, ensuring regular, overtime, differential and unpaid hours flow correctly.​​
    • Handling of exceptions like missing punches, late time submissions and retro corrections, and how these flow into payroll runs.​​

    When Time Tracking and Payroll disagree, payroll will resort to manual overrides. The more alignment you build upfront, the fewer fights you have at cut-off.​

    Governance, testing and ongoing optimization

    To keep Time Tracking clean over time:

    • Document a Time Tracking design playbook: which Time Entry Methods, Time Codes, Templates and Schedules you use and why.​
    • Test with real-life scenarios: overtime across weeks, holiday work, project changes mid-week, and combination of Time Off plus worked hours.​​
    • Monitor reports like “Unsubmitted Timesheets”, “Time Block Corrections” and “Hours by Time Entry Code” to spot design issues early.​

    Treat Time Tracking as a living configuration, not a one-time setup. As the business introduces new work patterns, projects or pay rules, update configuration using the same principles rather than patching with one-off codes and templates.​

    A complete blueprint for clean Workday Time Tracking is ultimately about clarity: clear methods, clear codes, clear schedules and clear calculations. When workers know exactly how to enter time and payroll trusts the output, you know your configuration is doing its job.